Cruz, Paul and Lee are probably the only three I would trust right now so, could it be that she is right on this? I have not seen the bill but it is possible. As Ronald Reagan once said, “it does not matter who gets credit” if it is the right thing to do.
Cruz, Paul and Lee are probably the only three I would trust right now so, could it be that she is right on this? I have not seen the bill but it is possible. As Ronald Reagan once said, “it does not matter who gets credit” if it is the right thing to do.
////////////////
First, as far as I am aware, none of the above (to include the odious Gillibrand) has served so much as a single day in the Armed Forces of this country, my first response to them is, butt the h*ll out of this issue.
Second, I do believe — and have already posted as much on another thread — that this is Cruz’s first tactical mistake.
I do believe he is trying to suck up to someone — be it Dems or Libs in general, or, perhaps, as one poster has suggested, women, but... he is not going to help himself much, unless he can serve as a DRAG on the liberal tendencies of Gillibrand.
The entire sexual assault isssue — other than the occasional outlyer - can be laid at the feet of two (easily reversible) causes: 1) Introduction of women to the the military academies, barracks, ships, planes, and tents of our fighting men; and 2) Normalization of sodomy in the military.
Reverse these trends, and problem solved. Women can have their own military academy, fly in all female crews, sail with all female complements, and deploy with all-female platoons, if they are so much needed.
For the sodomites, on the other hand, a reversion back to the UCMJ of 1955 or so will be all that is needed. Bye-bye to the openly light-in-the-loafers crowd, but still room for the homosexuals who are able to “keep it to themselves.”