Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JCBreckenridge
Why must a blockade not include air and naval attacks in order to contain the Japanese?

Contain them? That is the definition of a blockade, they aren't going anywhere. Air and naval attacks would continue to kill civilians, wasn't that the purpose of the bombs? But it is okay to kill them in another, less efficient way. The attacks risk our men when the blockade is supposed to be sufficient.

By starving the people, it would lead to their own destruction.

The IJN was done, it was the army running the show in the home islands, as for the destruction of the military leadership, it was assured in any case. I doubt the army plan for the use of civilians cared that they would be slaughtered by us. The army would have been fed, the Japanese civvies showed nothing but obedience to their masters.

275 posted on 08/12/2013 9:27:30 PM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies ]


To: xone

“Japanese civvies showed nothing but obedience to their masters.”

Right, that’s because the Japanese have no souls of their own, eh? /sarc

I don’t believe this for a second.


276 posted on 08/12/2013 9:51:49 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson