Or just train more dogs
1 posted on
08/09/2013 12:57:45 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
If cheaper than lab work and MRI go for it.
To: BenLurkin
For once, we’ll WANT a dog to sniff someone down below...
3 posted on
08/09/2013 12:59:29 PM PDT by
dirtboy
To: BenLurkin
Most dogs like to use their snout to upskirt gals.
4 posted on
08/09/2013 1:04:07 PM PDT by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
To: BenLurkin
I’ve read about some pretty interesting bio-sensors that potentially can become cheap enough to be built into things like cellphones, where they will sniff the breath of the user to identify early-stage diseases. That could have a big impact on healthcare costs, not to mention lives.
5 posted on
08/09/2013 1:09:58 PM PDT by
bigbob
To: Revolting cat!; Slings and Arrows
The results of the lab test are in...
To: BenLurkin
Dogs are more expensive recurring. Inorganic items are very expensive up front non-recurring but virtually delete the recurring costs if it comes to be.
14 posted on
08/09/2013 6:58:24 PM PDT by
the OlLine Rebel
(Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
To: BenLurkin
20 posted on
08/10/2013 4:23:32 PM PDT by
Hillarys Gate Cult
(Liberals make unrealistic demands on reality and reality doesn't oblige them.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson