To: dmz
Sorry, yes, she said the existence of written code demonstrates that the Bible is historically accurate. That is, writing existed, ergo, God’s people had a written language and could write down their history.
9 posted on
08/05/2013 8:35:06 AM PDT by
knittnmom
(Save the earth! It's the only planet with chocolate!)
To: knittnmom
That writing existed is not evidence that the Bible existed in this period. That we lacked evidence of writing in this period is also not proof that the bible did not exist. Absence of evidence does not equal evidence of absence.
13 posted on
08/05/2013 9:01:12 AM PDT by
JCBreckenridge
("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
To: knittnmom
Sorry, yes, she said the existence of written code demonstrates that the Bible is historically accurate. That is, writing existed, ergo, Gods people had a written language and could write down their history. For some reason, I'm reminded of a story where civilization is recovering from a apocalyptic event, and some future archeologists come across a copy of the Star Fleet technical Manual...
17 posted on
08/05/2013 9:36:30 AM PDT by
PapaBear3625
(You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson