Now that morning is here and your credibility was risked and lost in the manner of a drunk at a Las Vegas blackjack table blowing his entire remaining bankroll by splitting a pair of sixes and then doubling down and busting on two stiff hands, then stumbling back to his seedy hotel room in an alcoholic haze with bad breath and empty pockets, how do you feel?
Now, let's examine the rest of your drama-queen attention-seeking post in which you apparently want to create the impression with us that you have more sources in high places than Bob Woodward.
First, 120 embassies have been shut down. The rationale is presumably because AQ is planning an attack. Fine, go with that but that's not the real reason I am hearing from credible sources. I'll say in my own defense that I was told by another source last October, a substantial source who nevertheless did not have 100% of my trust, that Israel would attack Iran and that WW III would start as a result. I argued with that source and refused to relay it further. So when I hear of major predictions, I'm not quick to buy into them. But this source is very credible to me.
As the gin and tonics from last night wear off, you have to ask yourself, what were you thinking when you posted that nonsense?
Probably my biggest pet peeve here on Free Republic is when anonymous people anonymously post unsubstantiated information from anonymous sources.
If you have opinions of your own about what might happen, fine, post away. Sometimes I speculate on events and engage in a little conspiracy theory now and then, but I don't try to make myself seem more important than I am by claiming to know people in high places who are confiding in me. That's just lame. That's like some insecure high school kid who is trying to impress a girl by saying he jammed with Peter Frampton and smoked weed with him one night.
Wow! Great rant!
I guess I’ll save my Peter Frampton story for another thread.