Replies

I almost forgot about your ability to claim words mean something other than what they plainly say! “Telling the publisher” does not equate to “telling the flunky.”

You didn't say "telling the publsher" ... and the rest of your point is meaningless because there was no "flunky." You talked about an assumption but there was none. Again, the publisher said it was a "fact checking error." This would mean according to their own posted procedures that Obama wrote his bio and they did NOT check the facts that he wrote. And why would they?? And how would they check such a fact when that information came directly from him?? Your speculation is about a phantom "flunky" making a phantom "assumption" is plain nonsense. Just admit it. You're wrong. I proved it.

As your posts are becoming increasingly untethered from reality, I think I'll just place a couple more actual facts here, for the benefit of anyone still reading, and then slowly back away from this thread.

1. You now say "You didn't say 'telling the publsher.'" But I originally wrote "did he tell them something like 'my family came from Kenya'" and you yourself turned that into

You claimed Obama "told" this information to a so-called "flunky"

and

in this construction from your earlier post, "flunky" is part of "them."

So first you claim I said he told the flunky because he told the publisher, and now you claim I didn't say he told the publisher. Forgive me if I don't try to make sense of that.

2. You write "the rest of your point is meaningless because there was no 'flunky.'" But the woman who says she made the fact-checking error says she was "an agency assistant at the time." Now you're claiming not just that she's lying when she says it was a fact-checking error, but that she doesn't even really exist at all!

And that's as far into your hall of mirrors as I intend to go.