Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: fabian
"It was at the top back of the head consistent with the knoll kill shot. I am not debating with a person that lies a d says Jackie was not scrambling for his brains. Those are facts that are known and I think you are a mole or something. Take care."

Something doesn't become a fact just because it's your opinion. No, it's not a known fact that Jackie was chasing brains.

You aren't debating, that's true. You just make assertions about your own opinions. Do you realize that a shot from the knoll at the time of the head shot would NOT be to the front? It would be to the right side of the President, and the bullet would have to exit the other side of head and hit Jackie? No, I didn't think so. Conspiracy books don't like to point that out.


126 posted on 08/01/2013 12:29:58 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]


To: mlo

You are being dishonest again. The front side of the head is consistent with a second shooter, not Oswald. You are full of bahloney and somehow your are so lacking it commonsense or you were deliberately paid or planted here to argue the ridiculous. Either way I sort of fell sorry for you. I have been debating, so stop your bs. Thanks a d have a good one!


127 posted on 08/01/2013 12:42:26 PM PDT by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo in laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson