To: thackney
So she slept on the job, exposed her station to embarrassing “nip slips” and (deliberately) set up potential “wardrobe malfunctions” on camera, stole mail (from others at work?), and manipulated her interviews to make HER look good and demean the people she was taping/recording .....
Then wrote it all down in public.
And the station doesn’t have the right to fire her?
29 posted on
07/30/2013 7:08:57 AM PDT by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
So she slept on the job, exposed her station to embarrassing nip slips and (deliberately) set up potential wardrobe malfunctions on camera, stole mail (from others at work?), and manipulated her interviews to make HER look good and demean the people she was taping/recording ..... I suspect she stole mail from those she was waiting to interview, but otherwise I agree. She is very cute (rare for liberals) but not at all a nice woman. I imagine her boss was grateful to have so public an excuse.
34 posted on
07/30/2013 7:39:02 AM PDT by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
exposed her station to embarrassing nip slips
Technical speaking she didn't have nip slips(exposure of the areola) but rather the term "pokies"(Said nipples pressing through blouse, sweater, etc.)
Nothing personal, just keeping in line with FP protocol(wink)(wink)
46 posted on
07/30/2013 10:40:01 AM PDT by
RedMonqey
("Gun-free zones" equal "Target-rich environment.")
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Nobody said they didn’t have the Right, the question is WHY? The other networks are lying, making up news and outright instigating crap, so she wrote something on Tweeter, Twitter or Face F—k and has nice boobs. Why fire her?
49 posted on
07/30/2013 10:56:58 AM PDT by
Safetgiver
( Islam makes barbarism look genteel.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson