Replies

None of those were issues in 2008. You are obfuscating the point with a bunch irrelevant bullshit.

So you're accusing Sarah of bringing up "a bunch of irrelevant bullshit?"

The point was that birthers, once again, have done what birthers do. Which is misrepresent reality.

Birthers posted an article claiming that Sarah Palin wasn't allowed to talk about Obama's BS "eligibility problem."

The clip they provided, as always, did not support the BS claim.

Sarah talked about or referred to all the things I mentioned in that clip. The things you reference were written on a clipboard that she held up as she spoke.

What Palin actually said in that clip about 2008 was that she was "not allowed to tell the truth about the person was, Barack Obama." Who a person is constitutes their identity, nationality and parentage.

Yes, and she also held up a clipboard with those items written on it.

The ONE thing that Sarah did NOT talk about was the nonexistent birther bullshit "eligibility problem."

And the reason why I say it's bullshit is because a) the "natural born citizen" Constitutional claims are clear bullshit that have been disproved in about a zillion different ways. And b) when it comes to the forgery claims, it's now been demonstrated pretty close to the exact model of Xerox WorkCenter that produces all the things in the PDF that birthers said were "proof of forgery."

Never mind a lot of other things, like the photographs of the original paper document.

But my point in the post you refer to was: Once again, birthers post BS. And it's obvious BS. I viewed the clip from beginning to end. And Sarah Palin never said or intimated any such thing.