Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor

Oh, and Enoch? Barley mentioned in the canonical books of the Bible. Ten references mostly genealogy and ages, and he had a city named after him, and he walked with God and was no more.

The epistle Enoch wrote didn’t make the cut, it’s quite literally non-Biblical.


104 posted on 07/24/2013 12:52:31 PM PDT by null and void (Republicans create the tools of oppression, and the democrats gleefully use them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: null and void

The epistle of Enoch was recognized by Yeshua as Biblical, but 300 years later when the pagans formed the catholic church they kicked it out.

It’s the most informative book in the Bible from a geophysical point of view. The pagans didn’t like it because it told the whole truth about the “angels.”


106 posted on 07/24/2013 1:09:56 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson