[Future Snake Eater]

It could've been an interesting article but for several issues:

1) She was intent on slapping idiotic Brady Campaign stats lies all throughout.

2) She never acknowledged that she should get more training, whether it was mandated by Big Brother or not.

3) She never had the epiphany that maybe some people just shouldn't be armed and that she's obviously one of them. While she does reference the responsibility of carrying a gun, she seems to stop at "I can't handle it, therefore no one else can either."

4) And the most egregious error on her part: equating not thinking about a threat as being the same as that threat no longer existing. Such a basic, basic fallacy in thought, and she let it right on out.

[Sherman Logan]

And the most egregious error on her part: equating not thinking about a threat as being the same as that threat no longer existing. Such a basic, basic fallacy in thought, and she let it right on out.

Bingo. You see that one all the time.

On 9/12 there were all these interviews about how people no longer felt safe.

I, OTC, felt more safe. Knowing a danger exists is better than being unaware. Less comforting, but it at least allows you to prepare yourself mentally.

You always see discussions of whether people feel safe in particular neighborhoods, as if there is any correlation with their actually BEING safe.

[exDemMom]

4) And the most egregious error on her part: equating not thinking about a threat as being the same as that threat no longer existing. Such a basic, basic fallacy in thought, and she let it right on out.

She's a liberal. Why would you expect her to think logically?