[Vanders9]

Thats a straw man argument. Just because I think that change is and should happen doesn't neccesarily mean that I endorse all proposed changes. I just object to change being dismissed solely because it is change. That level of adherence to tradition is frankly unhealthy. In fact it will stagnate society just as efficiently as the antics of the homosexual mafia. As for "unlike a rebellion for more freedom in society" - are you seriously suggesting that a revolution has to be violent in order to be valid?

Agreed there has to be standards and norms for a society to be peaceful, productive and moral. But they dont have to be exactly the same standards and norms all the time.

I think that defining an end to gender based primogeniture as "evil" is very much over the top.

[matginzac]

I see your “straw an agreement” and raise you two...
First - no where is there a statement that any change is bad. Endorsement of homosexuality as normal by making “gay marriage” legitimate is EVIL! It is change we cannot live with.
Second - again, NO where was there a statement that changing gender based primogeniture was “evil”. I really don’t care, quite frankly.
Seems to me your response was purposefully obtuse or you just don’t read very well.