Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Bryanw92

I think Bram Stoker and Count Dracula would disagree with your friends’ assessment.

Vampires should never be ‘androgynous’. And they shouldn’t ‘sparkle’ (I detest the Twilight series).


9 posted on 07/18/2013 1:49:01 PM PDT by AnAmericanAbroad (It's all bread and circuses for the future prey of the Morlocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: AnAmericanAbroad

>>I think Bram Stoker and Count Dracula would disagree with your friends’ assessment.

Read my post. I said “cool vampires”. Count Dracula, as found in the novel and pre-1980 movies is not really that hip.


10 posted on 07/18/2013 1:50:51 PM PDT by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: AnAmericanAbroad
As my brain-full-of-mush 19 yr old lib stepdaughter says, the "old" Dracula wasn't interesting because there was no explanation of his evilness. The "new" one has a perspective and a "reason". I told her I prefer the good ol' days, when monsters were monsters because.... they were monsters. Not because they were "misunderstood."

(oh, and agree totally about the overhyped, overrated Twilight. Haven't seen the movies but the books went from bad to worse).

11 posted on 07/18/2013 1:53:27 PM PDT by workerbee (The President of the United States is DOMESTIC ENEMY #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson