To: ShadowAce
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
That’s almost enough room to store all the B&W photos of Obama’s mother posing naked for porn magazines.
8 posted on
07/17/2013 9:06:50 PM PDT by
LyinLibs
(If victims of islam were more "islamophobic," maybe they'd still be alive.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
My first hard drive had a capacity of 20 megs. We are rapidly approaching the point where an inexpensive external hard drive will store a million times that much.
9 posted on
07/17/2013 9:08:34 PM PDT by
Kip Russell
(Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors -- and miss. ---Robert A. Heinlein)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
A 64 bit address space is in excess of 180,000 terabytes.
12 posted on
07/17/2013 9:24:11 PM PDT by
Steely Tom
(If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
At some point they're going to hit a physical limit on how much data they can fit on a 3.5" drive. But they're obviously not there yet. They smashed through 1 TB and they're still trucking.
What comes after tera?
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Here’s what annoys me. They make a fine 1TB drive, but then limit the size of the node failure storage to 2000 entries or so. So the storage fills up, and the drive is useless. Even though it still have almost all of it’s capacity.
I’d hope that with the larger drives, they would increase the failed node storage size.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Wow. I remember life back then, 10 MB was Hugh. Now, with, memory cards, the cloud and wireless .. if you can’t do sub-nanular, it’s just crap.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
42 posted on
07/19/2013 2:05:26 PM PDT by
dfwgator
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson