Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic; Texas Songwriter
False dichotomies were never a very good tool for investiingating Truth.

Believing that science works requires faith that the system works and leads one to the truth.

And considering the track record science has it's pretty shaky ground. True today and disproved tomorrow is more the byword.

Presuming that there is an objective standard of truth is faith.

Presuming that there is an objective standard of truth that can be reached by some mechanism developed by man is faith.

Presuming that one has reached that objective standard of truth requires faith.

How does the scientist even know when they're reached the *truth* of a matter?

It reminds me of the Scripture penned 2,000 years ago.... "always learning and never able to arrive at a knowledge of the truth".

So, what is truth and how do you know when you've attained it?

98 posted on 07/26/2013 6:47:03 AM PDT by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: metmom

What’s the track record of finding Truth by peddling FUD?


99 posted on 07/26/2013 6:59:24 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

To: metmom
And considering the track record science has it's pretty shaky ground. True today and disproved tomorrow is more the byword.

Seriously? You're going to claim that science is characterized more by its failures than its successes? When we live in a world that science made, for better or for worse? That sounds desparate.

112 posted on 07/26/2013 10:30:57 AM PDT by Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson