Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/14/2013 10:08:38 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Perdogg; Revolting cat!

He’s a she???


2 posted on 07/14/2013 10:11:03 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: zot; Interesting Times

JK Rowlings is a man? or is Richard Brooks a woman?


3 posted on 07/14/2013 10:14:38 AM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

The article said that the book sold a wopping 1,500 copies and was a “hit.” To me 1,500 copies is a failure. Methinks that Rawlings came out with the announcement to help rescue this bomb.


4 posted on 07/14/2013 10:18:58 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob (Democrats: Robbing Peter to buy Paul's vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg; a fool in paradise

Oh great, more penny awfuls from this graphomaniac with seven clichés per page (I counted!)!


5 posted on 07/14/2013 10:22:14 AM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg
It's clearly a huge scoop — but how exactly did Brooks manage to crack the literary world's best-kept secret?

Literary world's best-kept secret?!

I guess it must be. I've never heard of it...

6 posted on 07/14/2013 10:26:57 AM PDT by Flycatcher (God speaks to us, through the supernal lightness of birds, in a special type of poetry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

I really liked the Harry Potter series, although I readily admit it is not literature for the ages. It’s just like in the movie industry— G-rated adventure stories can be big blockbusters. But then the makers have to try to do something more ‘grown-up’ and they go on to produce R-rated stuff that bombs.

Family entertainment will not gain you respect from snobby peers in the industry, but it will make you a ton of money if you are reasonably good at it.


10 posted on 07/14/2013 10:36:37 AM PDT by married21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg
I think Stephen King pulled the same stunt with his low-selling Richard Bachman books. No one bought them for their ‘stand alone’ merits so they were linked to the big name to sell.
11 posted on 07/14/2013 10:39:01 AM PDT by ArtDodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

Are people still really taken in by this low-rent, see-through “viral marketing” in 2013.


13 posted on 07/14/2013 10:46:08 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

A “mysterious tweet” just outed her, huh? I’m sure her and her publisher are devastated now that the secret’s been revealed.


15 posted on 07/14/2013 11:02:01 AM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Some men just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg
... Hmm, there's quite a few things going on here.

First, you have a boutique imprint, by Little, Brown & Co, which typically handles under 5,000 copies at a time. This is the imprint that sold 1,500 copies on Amazon.co.uk; apparently it was the limit that Amazon could secure out of the print, all the rest of the copies were sold to book chains in the UK, which appears to be mostly sold out.

The Mulholland imprint handles worldwide distribution, and their minimum is 80,000 copies. Amazon typically commands no less than 30% of their runs, and appears to have sold out on Saturday night. The presses for Little, Brown & Co's Mulholland is running ragged, as present order window off of Amazon is 10-14 days, which means it will be the third printing if you ordered it today, or roughly 200,000 copies sold already.

So, for those who are interested in collecting books, hunt down this cover: from someone who has stock right now, and you'll likely have a book that will go up in value. Because of UK laws, this imprint does say that it is a pseudonym for the real author.

Oh, and as a side note, third printing will have the author bio of JK Rawling. First and second prints have the fake bio.

18 posted on 07/14/2013 11:08:12 AM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg; a fool in paradise

Check out the mysteries of Benjamin Black, alter ego of literary writer John Banville. In one interview, Banville said that as Banville he’s good for 500 words a day, and as Black for 5000.


20 posted on 07/14/2013 11:10:29 AM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg; tiredoflaundry; HungarianGypsy; JenB; Grendel9; dead; TwoWolves; js1138; MineralMan; ...

Harry Potter ping!


32 posted on 07/14/2013 12:06:39 PM PDT by null and void (Republicans create the tools of oppression, and the democrats gleefully use them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

39 posted on 07/14/2013 12:56:20 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

40 posted on 07/14/2013 12:58:58 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

I don’t know how twitter works, Brooks was replying on july 10 to Callegari and then the article says the account he was replying to “has no tweets since july 2.” What am I missing here?

Freegards


52 posted on 07/14/2013 5:36:02 PM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson