Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Doogle

Historians and fans of the technology may say there were better bombers in WWII, but for me, this one has all others beat on aesthetic grounds.

It’s just a purty piece of airplane.


9 posted on 07/13/2013 5:30:43 AM PDT by ExGeeEye (It's been over 90 days; time to start on 2014. Carpe GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ExGeeEye

..over 12,000 produced, only 39 survive today...

http://www.planesofthepast.com/b17-flying-fortress-surviving-aircraft.htm


11 posted on 07/13/2013 5:39:13 AM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: ExGeeEye
"It’s just a purty piece of airplane."

It also had a reputation for bringing its crews home, despite taking terrible damage.

12 posted on 07/13/2013 5:39:16 AM PDT by Flag_This (Real presidents don't bow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: ExGeeEye
Historians and fans of the technology may say there were better bombers in WWII, but for me, this one has all others beat on aesthetic grounds.

It’s just a purty piece of airplane.

The B24 was supposed to be better, it had a bigger pay load but a lower ceiling IIRC and it was very hard to fly, wore pilots out flying it. The B17 came home after sustaining tremendous damage, it was famous for that trait. To me WWII bombers mean the B17.

21 posted on 07/13/2013 6:37:30 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson