I have been going to meetings for a lot longer than 10 years and your so called claim of ‘many’ broken children being persuaded to file false charges against a parent is just flat out false. First since it is after all anonymous anyone can say anything ( and they often do). Have folks in AA been abused....sure a lot of them. Have folks in AA had pretty standard childhoods? Sure a lot of them. SInce you give a non quantifiable example it is meaningless. Moreover the type of information that you describe seems to only be shared by some newbie who hasn’t been told that you don’t share a fifth step at meeting level. And beyond that you have no business sharing what happens in a closed meeting outside of a closed meeting. But that’s okay because you had a ‘pure’ reason for doing so. Check your own self.
You pull numbers out of your ear for no reason. My comments were directed to the article as written. It was about Edmunton Canada.
Address the DNA evidence from post 13.
That is quantifiable. Try to explain it away.
I gave no specific names nor geographic information. The stories are common enough that individual anonymity is not endangered. Generalities about meetinhs are not abrogation of confidentiality.