Yes. They like kissing butt and they do it with much more gusto than any straight man.
What about the Manly Women who end up as the head of DHS?
Only if they’re running a salon or boutique.
Not having to leave the office on time because wife and kids are expecting you at home makes more.
No, but they are far less likely to have the predictable series of female love interests who invariably drain the finances of young normal men that are attempting to launch their financial future.
I’ve found that it depends on the industry. In a male-dominated industry with logical components such as IT, I find that manly men are seen as more intelligent, stable, and capable in their field.
In industries such as education, effeminate men have an advantage. The women who interview them relate to them on a different level than a gruff and tumbled man. I interviewed for jobs as an educator, but as a 6’2”, 350 lb. with a shaved head and goatee, I was generally seen as intimidating and hard than for the soft-hearted person I am. In general, women want to work with men they can manipulate (my wife has stated this on numerous occasions). Male managers, on the other hand, want a guy who can take the ball and run with it with little need for drama or education.
I kid, I kid
Two living as one. No child support. No alimony(just yet). Closed community, helping the like minded
What freakin’ “genetic factor?” What’s your proof?
Especially when the boss is a pillow biting twinky too.
No kids to support - no wife to take care of - no conventional moral limits. In an ‘earthly way’ there’s no reason they should be able to grab more ‘stuff’.
I think your theory is all wet. Single men don’t have to please a wife and can therefore devote all of their attention to their careers. Furthermore (if they llive with another guy) the salaries of the two of them (with no kids to support) can afford a nicer house and a fancier lifestyle, if that is what they want.
Moreover, I think that your categorization of “sissy” careers is ridiculous. I’ve known many “all male” hairdressers, for instance.
My niece told me about a phenomenon in college that she called “LUGs” (Lesbian Until Graduation)
The LUGs quickly found that being a lesbian carried a lot of advantages among professors who saw them as “brave” and tended to grade more easily. Housing was easier for them because no one wanted to risk being labeled homophobic or worse.
Many small minorities operate in this manner, including Jews in goy countries, Catholics in predominantly Protestant countries, and Freemasons in many societies.
Homosexuality is a developmental disorder. There is no homosexual gene. Genetically they are identical to heterosexuals. Not having to deal with women or children saves a lot of time and money they can devote to their careers.
Do psychopaths have an advantage in business negotiations?
Until a few hundred years ago, there was a class of men called eunuchs. Enough of them to create their own sub-culture in Muslim societies, as non-threating servants of royal courts.
I don’t think so. I think it’s more a symptom of a rotting culture.
How did they end up having so much power, that they are able to impose their will on 98 percent of the population in America and other Western nations?Has to do with the god of this world (2 Cor 4:4). He still has a lot of power and can give it to whomever he pleases (Luke 4:6).