Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Altariel

No he is not. If I were forced to guess I would say that 42 years ago possession in NC was a felony, but he was a kid so got a slap on the wrist. But it was still marked as a felony for purpose of record keeping and never changed when the law did.


23 posted on 07/11/2013 3:33:00 PM PDT by HenryArmitage (it was not meant that we should voyage far.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: HenryArmitage

why would g the record change?


25 posted on 07/11/2013 3:34:25 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: HenryArmitage
FTA...

Kelly's disqualification may in fact be unjustified under current law, which bars gun sales to people convicted of felonies but not misdemeanors (except for misdemeanors involving domestic violence). Unless the feds are treating what North Carolina called a misdemeanor as a felony for some reason, Kelly's pot conviction should not be covered by that provision.

27 posted on 07/11/2013 3:38:41 PM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" is more than an Army Ranger credo it's the character of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: HenryArmitage
But it was still marked as a felony for purpose of record keeping.....

If you could have been sentenced to ... blah blah blah, then your are hosed.

FR lawyers can illuminate.

61 posted on 07/11/2013 7:00:19 PM PDT by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson