Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Old Teufel Hunden
Why fight at Gettysburg?

Lee's strategy was to engage the enemy and destroy his army in detail.

He fought at Gettysburg because that is where his forces found the Union forces.

If he defeated Meade at Gettysburg and destroyed his army, the only thing standing between the ANV and Washington DC would have been the understrength perimeter troops.

3 posted on 07/08/2013 5:59:20 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: wideawake
"Lee's strategy was to engage the enemy and destroy his army in detail."

As I mentioned, I thought Lee was a better General than that. He won former battles by forcing the enemy to fight on his terms, he won by guile and manueverability. He never won any previous battle by fighting on the enemies terms and frontally assaulting fortified positions. No, he got the Union to do that.

The object of war should never be to attempt to destroy an army in detail. Did that work for Hannibal? No greater victory has ever been recorded in the annals of warfare than what Hannibal attained at Cannae. The classic double envelopment. He decimated the Roman Army, yet he still lost the war.

A lesson from our own history. Did the British sacking Washington cause us to lose the War of 1812?
5 posted on 07/08/2013 6:10:51 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: wideawake; Old Teufel Hunden

Lee was known to suffer from angina pectoris, and has been said to have been having pains during the battle of Gettysburg. Some historians believe that his angina may have affected his judgement at Gettsyburg. One theory, anyway.


6 posted on 07/08/2013 6:15:18 AM PDT by Hardastarboard (Buck Off, Bronco Bama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: wideawake
If he defeated Meade at Gettysburg and destroyed his army, the only thing standing between the ANV and Washington DC would have been the understrength perimeter troops.

Lee did not destroy the Union army at Second Bull Run, or Fredericksburg, or during the Seven Days battles, or at Antietam or Chancellorsville. What makes you think he would have destroyed it in Pennsylvania?

17 posted on 07/08/2013 7:19:02 AM PDT by 0.E.O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: wideawake

Not quite, Washington DC was one of the most heavily defended cities on the planet at the time. It was ringed with over 50 forts, with 800 cannon, with 20 miles of rifle trenches and hundreds of battery emplacements. Nearly 40,000 men manned these works. this large concentration of troops in Capitol meant that these men were not available to reinforce Army of the Potomac as it marched north. General Hooker resigned as the AOPs commander because Washington would not release any of the garrison to the AOP.


44 posted on 07/08/2013 5:59:10 PM PDT by X Fretensis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: wideawake

And failure to keep Lee out of Washington DC would have meant murder of government officials, burning of government buildings, and destruction of government records.

They didn’t want to ‘just be left along’. They wanted the whole US to be subject to the slave power.


49 posted on 07/08/2013 9:19:57 PM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson