To: Pan_Yan
According to the article in Daily Mail, the guy was not mauled to death, he was torn apart and eaten.
4 posted on
07/08/2013 5:18:51 AM PDT by
mware
To: mware
Tiger scat by the time help showed up.
To: mware
According to the article in Daily Mail, the guy was not mauled to death, he was torn apart and eaten.Well I'm glad to hear the tigers were being responsible hunters and not just killing for sport.
8 posted on
07/08/2013 5:36:00 AM PDT by
Pan_Yan
(I believe in God. All else is dubious.)
To: mware
According to the article in Daily Mail, the guy was not mauled to death, he was torn apart and eaten.
29 posted on
07/08/2013 10:44:22 AM PDT by
COBOL2Java
(I'm a Christian, pro-life, pro-gun, Reaganite. The GOP hates me. Why should I vote for them?)
To: mware
According to the article in Daily Mail, the guy was not mauled to death, he was torn apart and eaten. Not much difference in the outcome. All could be true: Mauled, then torn apart and eaten.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson