[Rusty0604]

Sounds like exemption for States with exchanges. With all the money these States spent getting the exchange running and giving grants to all the promoters common sense would dictate that they would be in a better position to comply with the regs.

[Paladin2]

Will you need a photo ID?

[Perdogg]

They need people to sign up, so they don’t care whether or not the information is correct.

[EagleUSA]

It is all about VOTES for the radical left. Nothing else, including healthcare — they could care less.

[nathanbedford]

New regulations published Friday scaled back the federal government’s role in determining whether information submitted to new health marketplace is accurate.

In writing the deciding opinion that Obamacare was in fact constitutional Chief Justice John Roberts justified or rather rationalized his abandonment of the Constitution with the cavalier observation to the effect that it was not the job of the Court to correct unwise legislation, that was the province of Congress.

The problem, Mr. Chief Justice, is that nobody, especially not Congressmen, knew what was in the legislation when it passed, indeed we have the third in line for the presidency of the United States telling us we had to pass the legislation to know what's in it. Now we find out that what's in it is nothing less than wholesale abdication of article 1 legislative responsibilities, the handing off to unnamed, faceless bureaucrats a virtually unfettered hunting license to create a healthcare regime as and when they see fit.

Mr. Chief Justice, you have abdicated your responsibilities no less than has the Congress of the United States. Congress will not legislate and the courts will not adjudicate but both wash their hands of the evil bureaucrats do. Try to get a court to seriously rule on a "regulation"-one can be more than half serious when he describes regulations as being treated by the courts as more sacrosanct than the Constitution itself.

Is a pity that we can't find a way to bring an action and complain that the runaway regulators are working hardship on African-Americans, or transvestites, or Mohicans (if we can find any) and then we could place the entire regime of healthcare regulators under 24/7 merciless scrutiny by the courts.

[Mr. K]

they will ONLY have to ‘verify’ it (for purposes of arrest and prosecution) for known Republicans

[traditional1]

Single-Payer; except for the favorite Classes (Blacks, Hispanics, Abortion-Seekers, Unions, etc.) The REST of Americans will pay for all the AIDS-infected (pre-existing condition) faggots, and pay for all the Flukeing-caused mistakes......more parasitic programs on the backs of Taxpayers, as always, to re-distribute the nation’s dwindling wealth.

[wildbill]

The lead paragraph is misleading and I think purposely boring in stating that the verification is about whether someone has employer provided insurance.

The true significance of the abandonment of verification is that an applicant for SUBSIDIES (eg. free insurance) is not going to be checked out if the applicant states they are eligible for the subsidy.

Bend over taxpayers, here comes a more expensive scam than the free Obamaphone.

[mykroar]

Sounds like the lunch program in the schools. Kansas doesn't require salary verification.

But of course, noone applies that doesn't qualify.