So, you mean because Bain might actually have problems you think Peter is not taking responsibility? He said his actions were terminating offenses but he also wanted others to understand the big picture. I guess big pictures are to much for you. So, no, your reading comprehension is not “excellent.” It is superficial at best.
In addition to excellent reading comprehension skills, I have excellent deductive reasoning skills. Mr Boyle brought Bain into the conversation in order to lay blame for his firing. Just as an appology that starts with “If I offended anyone...”, is not real, an admission that says “I’m guilty, but...” is not in earnest. He wasn’t working for Bain, he was working for Clear Channel, so why else bring them into it except to take the heat off himself? Why did he not talk about the management of Clear Channel who actually fired him?
Again I stand by my opinions. If you want to continue this discussion, please stick to Mr Boyle’s comments. I don’t appreciate, nor do I have time for, these insulting little shots at my intelligence.