[spetznaz]

One hundred percent correct Hodar. Had they stuck to the book it would have been amazing. As you mentioned, it was a foe that 'that never runs, has no concept of fear or mercy; never sleeps, never feels pain, remorse, fatigue, heat or cold.' That is what makes the idea of zombies threatening. Not that they are dangerous, because with their slow speed they are actually quite easy to kill (the book states it is possible to walk around them even), but that with ignorance of the threat, arrogance towards the threat, and general nonchalance, the threat increases to such an extent that something that could have easily been handled by a small group of men with baseball bats becomes an existential threat. Which is similar to any real-world problem we face today ...all are easy to fix at the beginning, but no one does anything until it is too big. It reminds me of an African proverb that states the best time to kill a crocodile is when it is still in its egg. Looking at the troubles facing the world, be it financial woes, radicalism, you name it, all could have been EASILY fixed at some point, but those who could have fixed it decided it wasn't urgent enough (or simply closed their eyes to the problem).

Anyways, going back to the book vs the movie. In the book the zombies are slow ...very slow. They do not scale walls. They do not run like frenzied banshees. They represent a slow but persistent threat, which is always and forever slowly stalking you. A threat that could have easily been fixed early enough, but is now everywhere. This is especially shown at the Battle of Yonkers, where the US Army faces off against the undead hordes. Total shock and awe, tanks and Apache helicopters, MLRS rockets and even napalm-type incendiaries. It should have been an easy win. However, rather than have the soldiers at strategic places (e.g. on top of buildings shooting down), they were exposed. At this time the undead numbered in the millions, and when the bullets ran out ....

I watched the movie. The zombies run. There is absolutely nothing to do with the book apart from the name. Nothing about the Chinese nuclear submarine and what it went through. Nothing about the millions of North koreans that are zombified in the tunnels. Nothing about the Battle of Yonkers. Nothing about the airforce pilot having to make it through zombie territory after ejecting. Nothing about how the plan the saved the world came from a South African Apartheid Government plan that was meant to save the minority whites in SA from the majority blacks in the 70s and 80s, and how the same plan to save the few from the many was used against the zombies. Nothing from the book, apart from a couple of things here and there such as the Israeli awareness of the threat due to the harsh lessons from the 6 Day War when they found out saying something is 'impossible' can be dangerous for a small country.

The movie seriously messed up.

[GrandJediMasterYoda]

Like I was saying in another post, I think the problem with Hollyweird is it’s mostly run by liberals, and with liberals you get all these fanatical sociopathic drug fueled egos. All of them have to put their 2 cents in because they all think they’re geniuses, and I *know* one of them mentioned the movie “28 days later” and the success of that, so of course they had to make the zombies run as well. You have all these Chiefs adding their 2 cents and before you know it the movie resembles almost nothing of the original script. I would imagine to make a good movie one would have to be like a tyrant, telling all these people to shut the hell up, but then that director or whoever would get a bad name because that’s how liberals work: When they don’t get their way they get revenge like their heroes Al Qaida.