Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: tcrlaf

I don’t see it ever getting down to 5% or 6% under this regime. Of course, with the Department of Labor working the stats, anything is possible I guess.


25 posted on 06/19/2013 12:27:13 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (23,116,441 households on Food Stamps! Now that's what I call HISTORICAL!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FlingWingFlyer

The huge proliferation of “29ers” is going to help the unemployment rate a fair amount. Basically replacing 3 full timers with 4 part timers.

Many of the schools here are moving their non-degreed staff to “29er” status to avoid Obamacare.


29 posted on 06/19/2013 12:30:36 PM PDT by nascarnation (Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: FlingWingFlyer
I don’t see it ever getting down to 5% or 6% under this regime.

Me either, but I wouldn't put it past them to manipulate the statistics to hit whatever number they want.

Look at the weekly UE figures. FR was paying attention to them for awhile (before everyone realized they were useless). Prior week's stats were *always* revised upwards. 51 out of 52 weeks, for one stretch, for example.

Now, I'm no statistician, but I'd expect them to be on the money a small percentage of the time, and be over / under the rest of the time, at a fairly even distribution. 40% over/ 40% under / 20% correct, plus or minus a couple of points either way, for instance.

But for the administration to be wrong - in their favor - nearly every single time, says to me that someone was jiggering with the numbers. Flip a coin, and see how long it takes you to get 51 out of 52 to come up heads.

39 posted on 06/19/2013 12:42:35 PM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson