To: SeekAndFind
All she would have needed to say was, “That’s a crock, next question, please.”
To: bigfootbob
I don’t watch this stuff, but you know you’d see a clip on the news if a gal had the stones to answer a dumb question with such a response.
17 posted on
06/17/2013 9:17:50 AM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: bigfootbob
All she would have needed to say was, Thats a crock, next question, please. Thank you. It's an idiotic, agenda-driven, loaded question and should be called out as such.
26 posted on
06/17/2013 9:31:55 AM PDT by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: bigfootbob
Alas, sometimes context requires one address a question as having a valid basis, even though the framework for the reasoning is deeply flawed.
“I cannot comprehend the confusion of mind which would produce such questions.” - Charles Babbage paraphrased
28 posted on
06/17/2013 9:34:59 AM PDT by
ctdonath2
(Making good people helpless doesn't make bad people harmless.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson