Skip to comments.
Bilderberg Group? No conspiracy, just the most influential group in the world
The Telegraph ^
| 6/6/2013
| Matthew Holehouse
Posted on 06/06/2013 8:23:59 AM PDT by rktman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Finally (maybe) I found a link to post info about the latest build-a-bear meeting. Some of the comments at the end of the article are quite (to me) interesting. Some of the attendees on the list are interesting as well. WTH? Armed security in GB? For the "well heeled", nothing is too good. After all, they ARE extremely important. In their own minds anyway. And they have the $$$$ to prove in. Shut up peons. You're dismissed..................
1
posted on
06/06/2013 8:24:00 AM PDT
by
rktman
To: rktman
...a £300-a-night golf hotel... That's less than $500 US. There are hotels in Des Moines that charge that much!
2
posted on
06/06/2013 8:28:42 AM PDT
by
jjotto
("Ya could look it up!")
To: rktman
What I don’t understand is the idea that powerful/influential people wouldn’t want to meet one another and try thereby to influence other powerful influential people.
What, in other words is surprising about this? In my town the Rotary Club amounts to the same thing. Is it a conspiracy, or is it really just networking?
3
posted on
06/06/2013 8:32:56 AM PDT
by
babble-on
To: babble-on
True. In our little county there is the “Inns of Court.” I have been asked why I don’t campaign for an invitation. It’s named after a judge who killed his wife and then shot himself. Somehow that seems creepy to me.
4
posted on
06/06/2013 8:38:53 AM PDT
by
Mercat
To: rktman
Google attends these meetings...massive surveillance of Internet , personal data may be part of this. Amazon is also there.
5
posted on
06/06/2013 8:48:51 AM PDT
by
opentalk
To: rktman
6
posted on
06/06/2013 8:53:33 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: babble-on
When there’s that much wealth and influence discussing how they can “make us better”, I get a little suspicious. Maybe it’s just me. If it’s all innocent, why the fence and armed security? I guess to keep out the riff raff and peons.
7
posted on
06/06/2013 8:53:45 AM PDT
by
rktman
(BACKGROUND CHECKS? YOU FIRST mr. president(not that we'd get the truth!))
To: rktman
Geithner, Goldman Sachs, Kissinger,Google ....attending
Kissinger recently gave a speech advocating United States and China collaborate on a new global order.
link
8
posted on
06/06/2013 9:56:29 AM PDT
by
opentalk

statue in gardens of Bilderberg meeting place.
9
posted on
06/06/2013 10:03:41 AM PDT
by
opentalk
To: rktman
If there was ever a place for a MOAB to be dropped...
To: rktman
I have heard that the Bilderbergers are the ones who decide who the next U.S. president will be.
In 2008, both Hillary and Obama secretly attended the Bilderberg meetings in Virginia right before the Dem convention. Afterward, Hillary suspended her campaign and let Obama take the nomination without any challenge.
Barack OBilderberg: Picking the President
To: opentalk
Mmmm, that just gives you a warm and fuzzy feeling eh? Yes yes, just a few blokes getting together for a pint, nothing to see here mate!
Hehe, I love conspiracy theories. I hope to check back later assuming the thread is still up...(spooky music cue...)
To: babble-on
Aren't these the people who conspired to take down Bear Stearns and bear raids on commodity markets?
13
posted on
06/06/2013 2:00:44 PM PDT
by
Sam Gamgee
(May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)
To: Sam Gamgee
To: rktman
15
posted on
06/07/2013 8:51:35 AM PDT
by
IbJensen
(Liberals are like Slinkies, good for nothing, but you smile as you push them down the stairs.)
To: IbJensen
Maybe the general “betray us” label was correct after all.
16
posted on
06/07/2013 8:53:21 AM PDT
by
rktman
(BACKGROUND CHECKS? YOU FIRST mr. president(not that we'd get the truth!))
To: IbJensen
That’s an interesting link ya got there.
To: rktman
Wonder what precipitated his ousting from the CIA. And replacement with a muslim.
Maybe they made him an offer he couldn’t refuse.
To: rktman
Let's see, a bunch of wealthy and powerful people decide to get together, in secret, to make plans and come to agreements. But that does not constitute a conspiracy.
Right. Got it.
19
posted on
06/07/2013 9:05:16 AM PDT
by
PapaBear3625
(You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
To: PapaBear3625
Only tea partiers are conspirarists. LOL!
20
posted on
06/07/2013 9:23:42 AM PDT
by
rktman
(BACKGROUND CHECKS? YOU FIRST mr. president(not that we'd get the truth!))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson