The folks who get complexity theory wrong when applying it to evolutionary biology are supposedly engaged in science — or at least philosophy of science — not promulgating popular culture, and yes, they are appealing to notions properly formalized by Kolmogorov.
Are you saying you cannot question a theory?? or adapt it to your own???
scientist do this often.
Is criticizing a theory unacceptable?/ That is what theory is about...to be tested.
Please cite your sources for claiming Behe or any other advocate of Intelligent Design were applying "complexity theory" to "evolutionary biology" rather than coining a descriptive term for a pedestrian concept.
Do you have a better term for Behe's signature concept outlined in "Darwin's Black Box?"
The statistically determined total improbability of evolution certainly has nothing to do with Kolmogorov.
Impossible is a real world state.