“Question.... Will the alignment of the magnetic axis and the geographic axis reduce the dynamo output from decreased rotation field friction resulting in a diminishing of our dipolar field strength and also result in a reduction of our magnetosphere field strength that protects us from the CMEs?”
“There is the distinct likelihood of that slim possibility, but it all depends.”
Seriously, the earth’s dipolar magnetic field and the corresponding magnetic field that creates our magnetosphere is a function of the output created by the earth. The greater the non-alignment of the core and crust of the earth, the greater the friction as each part is spinning on its own axis. It’s a dynamo that produces the electromagnetic field.
If the axis of the core and crust have a planetary alignment thus creating rotation alignment, the friction and output from the dynamo would decrease. A movement of the poles apart from each other would cause an increase in friction and result in a stronger dynamo output and stronger magnetosphere. This dance pattern of the magnetic core axis around the geographic crust axis would account for the patterns of weather changes over hundreds or thousands of years.
The real problem is when the earth’s magnetosphere is weak due to the alignment, if we are at solar max and hit with a reverse polarity CME, the vulnerability of the earth to a polar shift would increase. WE are entering a perfect storm.
A further proof of what I am saying is that the magnetic pole traveling across Canada has a daily wobble of up to 85 kilometers that varies in relationship with solar activity. (According to the Canadian Geophysics website that monitors the pole activity.) If the earth’s core wobbles based upon the solar output, then a reverse polarity CME could cause a wobble great enough to create a polar shift. Currently the sun, which reverses polarity every eleven years is at opposition to the earths field.
What is created is a pattern whereby the earth has a potential shift only when the sun’s field is strong and the earth’s is weak.
While “there is the distinct likelihood of that slim possibility,” and it all depends upon many factors, it would appear that those factors are shifting in a pattern that would explain many of the climate changes blamed on mankind.
...it would appear that those factors are shifting in a pattern that would explain many of the climate changes blamed on mankind.
Your analysis is excellent. Thank you for your kind reply.
Sometimes I forget just how tiny we humans and our problems are. We're just specs along for the ride.
Makes me wonder what locker number our dimension is kept in. I bet the Men In Black would know.