So did this Steve feller give up same sex sodomy or does he carry on with the “gay” life?
Rhetorical question, maybe the answer is in the (no doubt very lenghty) NYT article. I guess I could click the link.
It’s an interesting article, but as cherry said, it cries out for martyrdom. It downplays (as usual) the way these people contracted the disease, except for the women carriers mentioned, which was always drug use. I guess the author just assumes that the reader will know that the men contracted it through anonymous public bathroom sex from one or more nameless Johns. But it’s impolite or politically incorrect to say so.
Another question: did he resume behaviors after this new “lease on life” that led to his spreading the disease to others?