Why don't you summarize it here, or are you unable to defend it?
It only has a handful of reader reviews, and two of them are by WW.
The book description says, "An investigative report prepared for the general reader to explain how the most extraordinary claim made in the basic sciences during the twentieth century was mistakenly dismissed through errors of scientific protocol."
I know how *I* interpret that (big conspiracy, scientists don't know what they're talking about, bla bla bla). I'd bet your interpretation is along the same lines.