Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Wonder Warthog
"If "cold fusion" didn't violate so many laws of physics, and were a real phenomenon, we'd have seen it already in nature."
Actually, there is quite a bit of evidence that we "have" seen it in nature.

Prove it. Other than muon catalyzed cold fusion there is nothing accepted by science.

38 posted on 05/30/2013 9:07:40 AM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Moonman62
" Trolls, troublemakers, disruptors, forum pests, malcontents, RINOs, liberals, stalkers, et al, would continue posting to (harassing) someone after being asked to stop. Conservative FReepers would not."


44 posted on 05/30/2013 7:43:28 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62
Prove it. Other than muon catalyzed cold fusion there is nothing accepted by science.

The muon process takes a ton of energy (figuratively speaking). It isn't a source of energy.

You can also achieve a sort of fusion by bombarding atoms with neutrons. Again, this process does not release energy. Its use is to make radioisotopes for medicine and medical research.

Fusion, in the sense of pushing two charged atomic nuclei together to force them to fuse, is impossible except at really high temperature (i.e. at high energy), and only small charged atoms can be fused in this way. There is not sufficient energy in the galaxy to fuse large atoms together.

48 posted on 05/31/2013 4:32:07 PM PDT by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson