Would like to see a good old-fashioned cost/benefit analysis on this idea before wasting any time reading about it.
The government likes cost-benefit analyses, especially done before spending 100 times more on a public transportation project than should have been spent.
Cue the typical Green reaction:
“A **COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS** ??? That sort of supposedly “objective” thinking is indicative of male-dominated pen*s-science. and objectifies Mother Gaia. . . “
Did I get the tone right ??? (grin)