Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuclear futures: thorium could be the silver bullet to solve our energy crisis
The Conversation ^ | 22 May 2013 | Robert Cywinski

Posted on 05/25/2013 6:45:24 PM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 05/25/2013 6:45:24 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem
United Nation Agenda 21 will NEVER allow a cheap, clean energy source. They only want energy sources that don't work. The goal is to make life so expensive that all the peasants starve.

Thorium reactors would be the perfect solution, which is why they will not be permitted.

2 posted on 05/25/2013 6:47:55 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (It is the deviants who are the bullies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

‘The only source of energy that can meet global demand while avoiding greenhouse gas emissions is nuclear power’

This is misleading in so many ways. The largest greenhouse gas in the atmosphere is WATER VAPOR. It is impossible to produce large scale electricity without producing water vapor except in a damn. They keep tearing down the damns. All large scale power plants that are not damns are steam powered. Some use coal, some oil and some gas, but they all produce STEAM to run the dynamos.


3 posted on 05/25/2013 6:52:01 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The only source of energy that can meet global demand while avoiding greenhouse gas emissions is nuclear power.

This is the flaw. Carbon Dioxide is essential for life. No CO2, no plants. No plants, no oxygen. No oxygen, no humans.

More CO2, more plants, more life.

CO2 is not a poison, it is the essence of life.

4 posted on 05/25/2013 6:52:11 PM PDT by FatherofFive (Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Unlike conventional uranium fuel, thorium is burnt

I wouldn't want to live downwind form one of those power plants.

5 posted on 05/25/2013 6:57:00 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Well the way things have been going none of this will ever happen. Algore and the rest of the shrieking Eco freaks will not let it happen for the following........ (you fill in the blank)
6 posted on 05/25/2013 6:58:40 PM PDT by mongo141 (Revolution ver. 2.0, just a matter of when, not a matter of if!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

I understand your point, but it shows a drastic misunderstanding of how water vapor works in the atmosphere.

H2O is naturally present in up to 1 to 3 parts per hundred, not low parts per million, as with all the other greenhouse gases. Uniquely, it constantly goes in and out of the atmosphere by the processes of evaporation and condensation.

IOW, while man can affect the humidity somewhat in the locally by things such as irrigation systems, he is utterly incapable of affecting the amount of water vapor air on a global basis.

The teensy amounts produced by industrial processes are quite literally not measurable on a global scale relative to those produced by natural evaporation. 3/4 of the earth’s surface, after all, is water. When heated by the sun, it evaporates at an enormous rate.

These things can be quantified, if you like, but I hope you can just agree that man is not going to change the hydrologic cycle in any significant way. Just can’t do it. The only reason we can affect the amount of carbon, if indeed we are, is because there wasn’t much there to begin with.


7 posted on 05/25/2013 7:04:04 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The future of nuclear energy is LENR.

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/coldfusion/index?tab=articles

Keywords: ColdFusion; LENR; lanr; CMNS ; ecat


8 posted on 05/25/2013 7:06:06 PM PDT by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive
CO2 is not a poison, it is the essence of life.

The dose is the poison. CO2 is indeed a deadly toxin, as crews of a number of submarines have discovered. People living near volcanoes have also been killed.

Concentrations of 7% to 10% (70,000 to 100,000 ppm) will kill within minutes or hours. Course that''s a WHOLE lot less than the <400 ppm in the atmosphere now.

9 posted on 05/25/2013 7:09:23 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

What energy crisis? Global warming is a hoax and we have an ample supply of carbon based fuels.


10 posted on 05/25/2013 7:13:31 PM PDT by A_Tradition_Continues (formerly known as Politicalwit ...05/28/98 Class of '98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town; FatherofFive

‘The only source of energy that can meet global demand while avoiding greenhouse gas emissions is nuclear power’

Why are you getting wrapped around the axle because of feel good BS?

There’s loads of thorium, and if that ADSR pans out, we can mix it with all the toxic, radioactive waste we already generated for more energy.


11 posted on 05/25/2013 7:13:58 PM PDT by neverdem (Register pressure cookers! /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
The dose is the poison.

Right. Di-hydrogen monoxide is lethal as well.

Try to live without it.

12 posted on 05/25/2013 7:14:38 PM PDT by FatherofFive (Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive

Quite true.

As is oxygen, FTM.


13 posted on 05/25/2013 7:16:44 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I’m all for it, along with Cold Fusion and the XL Pipeline..


14 posted on 05/25/2013 7:20:44 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

Dude, you clearly are not properly aligned with the low flush toilets.


15 posted on 05/25/2013 7:21:59 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; Kevmo

Very interesting.

More info here:

https://sites.google.com/site/thoriumenergycheaperthancoal/


16 posted on 05/25/2013 7:24:30 PM PDT by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_Tradition_Continues
What energy crisis?

The author is from the University of Huddersfield, UK. They do.

The University of Huddersfield in Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, can trace its roots back to a Science and Mechanic Institute founded in 1825. It has two external campuses in Oldham, Greater Manchester, and Barnsley, South Yorkshire. A founding member of the Northern Consortium and member of Yorkshire Universities, it is among the top 10 greenest universities in Britain.

17 posted on 05/25/2013 7:28:11 PM PDT by neverdem (Register pressure cookers! /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

The same could be said about CO2. The teensy amount we produce pales in comparison to the amount produced by the oceans alone. Any excess produced by burning so called fossil fuels could be mitigated by the planting of trees.

I like the idea of Nuclear, or as GWB calls it Nucular, power. I just hate the thought that his very first statement is demonstrably incorrect.


18 posted on 05/25/2013 7:28:14 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
One of the funniest memes floating around is the idea that we will "run out of water." Now we might very well run out of clean water if we do stupid things, and/or run out of water where we want it.

But water is quite literally (and not in the Joe Biden sense) the most abundant material on Earth. And it is also remarkably easy to purify. Happens naturally all the time and even easy to duplicate synthetically.

19 posted on 05/25/2013 7:28:32 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I like nuclear energy. Using thorium would be great and I am all for it. t is that feel good BS is the reason why we will never utilize the energy.


20 posted on 05/25/2013 7:30:38 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson