Do you recall what I said the forth time you posted that same phrase or one like it..?
I said it does not matter that he was there or not there.
The test people put their stuff right where they were said to be able to put it. They had the camera at a low angle, a couple of simple metered thermocouples, CT pickups on the line side of the control box.
Their laptop did the rest....I have hired guys like this a dozen times to monitor a process or a machine that requires certification. I know what they do, they do it for a living and they do exactly what they are asked to do or in some circumstances they tell you what they need to do to be certified.
I always asked them to do a bit more than required because I wanted bearing temperatures and rise times on temperature sensitive stuff for maintenance records.
But they don’t analyze subjective stuff, like “did it work” or is it cold fusion. They only report what their instruments told them. And I don’t question what their instruments told them. I question what they measured! I question if what they measured is what the inventor says it is.
And I don’t question what their instruments told them. I question what they measured! I question if what they measured is what the inventor says it is.
***They measured heat. They read a thermometer. They measured input power, using multimeters and clamp ammeters. For Rossi to be able to squib those results when he isn’t even in the room he’d have to be the greatest magician alive. You sure have a high opinion of that man. My opinion of him is much less: lousy scientist, crappy demonstrator, Edisonian inventor, probably just lucky.