I do not accept the 10x more than any chemical known....
I accept the test readings so far as they go, but I believe the 10X which is based of those readings to be exaggerated by multiple steps taken during the test.
So lets say it was 5X.......would that be so impressive to you.
But I can’t estimate it. The test was rudimentary and lacked even what I would call scientific methods of standard testing, starting with the dummy control vessel and continuing through to the paint and the lack of a testing environment.
So at best it’s only interesting to poke at and see what falls out. But to me it proves nothing about cold fusion. At least had it melted down I could have said it might be fusion of the hotter variety, or had they revealed what was in the device I would have taken some time with that before getting PO’d about the test.
I accept the test readings so far as they go,
***Good, then you accept that 7 scientists can read multimeters and thermometers.
but I believe the 10X which is based of those readings to be exaggerated by multiple steps taken during the test.
***Point out where, and how 7 scientists would miss what you say is so obvious.
So lets say it was 5X.....
***No. You’ve posted your belief, now back it up.
..would that be so impressive to you.
***not particularly.
But I can’t estimate it. The test was rudimentary
***If it’s so obviously based on exaggerated by multiple steps, point out those steps. Otherwise, you’re just engaging in vapid speculation.
and lacked even what I would call scientific methods of standard testing,
***Why would you call it that? These 7 scientists have credentials, go ahead and post yours to show how your position is superior so that when you say, “what I would call” then we have a reason to listen to you.
starting with the dummy control vessel and continuing through to the paint and the lack of a testing environment.
***Dummy control vessel is standard testing for a control; paint??? Who cares? Lack of a testing environment is just technospeak for you don’t like it. It’s standard black box testing.
So at best it’s only interesting to poke at and see what falls out.
***Then why bother even discuss it.
But to me it proves nothing about cold fusion.
***It proves that Rossi has something. If the tests turned out negative, he’d be hiding under a rock right now. Just treat it as if it’s some new chemical that gives 10X energy density.
At least had it melted down I could have said it might be fusion of the hotter variety,
***The first test DID melt down. This is the 2nd set of tests.
or had they revealed what was in the device I would have taken some time with that before getting PO’d about the test.
***Always going back to what’s-in-the-box, even though time & again it’s been pointed out that it’s an industrial trade secret and Rossi can’t get a patent, so it wouldn’t be in his best interest at all to open kimono on his $100Billion development.