[Cold Heat]

10X of any known chemical

Ummmm.....OK...Ya...

I think that from the graphs I saw, they were comparing to common fuels used today for power generation or batteries. I did not see references to all chemicals or compounds that release energy.. Never the less, I never said the test as described was not interesting in the way they did it. Just not convinced it was transmutation of nickel into copper. I say that because they seem to be hiding something. It could theoretically be true that they found something, but they are still hiding something. And because it's so obvious to me, I can't begin to buy into it.

[Kevmo]

I did not see references to all chemicals or compounds that release energy..
***Then maybe you can find where they made some sort of mistake.

It could theoretically be true that they found something,
***to quote you yourself, “Ummmm.....OK...Ya...” but now you’re saying they “theoretically” found something. Either you accept the 10x figure or you don’t.

but they are still hiding something
***Industrial trade secrets. It happens far more often than you think.

[Wonder Warthog]

"I did not see references to all chemicals or compounds that release energy.."

This was examined to death in commentary on one of the prior tests (not "Hot Cat"), in which one commenter "did" list a huge number of reactive compounds, and their possible theoretical energy releases. Alan somebody or other. Been done.