There is always the cylinder inside the cylinder. It’s supposed to be stainless....it does have nickel in it and it has mass as do the heating coils, but they never open this thing up so who knows....
Reminds me of a joke told at most work places about two guys finally getting caught stealing stuff from the plant. Everyday they walked right past the guard house with wheelbarrows full of dirt. The guard would check the dirt and found it to be just what it looked like and waived them through.
It was weeks before they figured out that they were stealing wheelbarrows and not dirt.
There is always the cylinder inside the cylinder. It’s supposed to be stainless....it does have nickel in it and it has mass as do the heating coils, but they never open this thing up so who knows....
***Regardless, it would still be a chemical. The energy density measured was 10X of any known chemical. Cute story but not particularly relevant unless they somehow stole 15 adult elephants each time there was supposed to be a wheelbarrow full of dirt.
There is always the cylinder inside the cylinder.
***What a bunch of hooey. You’re giving the calculation LESS volume rather than more volume, so that the energy density observed would be 20,000 times more dense than gasoline. What you wanna be doing is going in the opposite direction, trying to come up with some way that the cylinder observed is only appearing 1/10th as big as it actually is. Again, such a neat trick would make Rossi the best magician on the planet.