Lookie here my FR iend.....
I was responding to the reply made by someone else and the subject matter happens to be smack dab in the middle of my chosen field,(I am a Master Electrician)
Now that we have been properly introduced, the only comment I have to you about this magical invention is that “Thou Protest Too Much.”
I have been around for more than 60 years and have seen many of these things come and go....too many to remember. Some 35 years ago I got all excited about some guy’s new generator that purported to create far more energy than it consumed. It tuned out to be a total loss on my investment of time and money and somewhat of a embarrassment to me and many others but it taught me something. That “something” was simply that “If it looks and sounds better than it should, it likely is not what you think it is.”
Just some friendly advice because it is obvious to me that you are head over heels into this device. That alone should be a warning sign to you....not to me because I won’t believe it until they form a legit company and sell a few hundred of them and even after that I would question the feasibility and ability to scale up or down to to form factors that would be useful.
This cold fusion crap has been beat to death almost as long as the perpetual motion machine. It’s going to take a lot more than a few tests, and a as yet secret catalyst and a few claims before this guy gets any serious attention except for a few dreamers, and some decades ago I was one of those dreamers as you are today.
So if I were you, I would lighten up a bit and try harder to NOT take this creation so seriously that you isolate yourself from the critics and the questions they pose.
You may find yourself with more egg on your face than you can wash off easily....
Lookie here my FR iend..... I was responding to the reply made by someone else
***Then send it as freepmail. When you post it, it is posted to everyone, and that means the defenders of the hypothesis are expected to respond. Otherwise we are aske, why didn’t you respond to such & such???
the only comment I have to you about this magical invention is that “Thou Protest Too Much.”
***If LENR is a scaleable technology, then it will be the ost disruptive in history. How can a person be accused of “protesting too much” in such a situation, other than that you are arguing from a simple cliche and don’t know what you’re talking about?
I have been around for more than 60 years and have seen many of these things come and go....too many to remember.
***What a bunch of horse sheeite. When was the last time you saw this much controlled energy density demonstrated in contrast to gasoline? The answer is NEVER.
Some 35 years ago I got all excited about some guy’s new generator that purported to create far more energy than it consumed. It tuned out to be a total loss on my investment of time and money and somewhat of a embarrassment to me and many others but it taught me something.
***Did that dude submit to 7 independent scientists testing his box without him being present? No, he did not.
That “something” was simply that “If it looks and sounds better than it should, it likely is not what you think it is.”
***Well, now, I agree that you were a fool, but that does not mean that these 7 independent scientists who put their reputations on the line were as foolish as you.
Just some friendly advice
***Where is the advice? All you have done is tell a story of how foolish you have been in the past. Did your scam artist submit to 7 scientists, without even being present for the tests? no.
because it is obvious to me that you are head over heels into this device.
***You are still a fool. I think LENR is real. It has been replicated more than 14,700 times and that was before Rossi came onto the scene.
That alone should be a warning sign to you....
***When you were duped by a con artist, was his scientific finding replicated more than 14,700 times? Nope.
not to me because I won’t believe it until they form a legit company and sell a few hundred of them
***By that time, no one will be interested in what you have to say.
and even after that I would question the feasibility and ability to scale up or down to to form factors that would be useful.
***After they sold a few hundred of them? You are truly reduced in your mental capacity.
This cold fusion crap has been beat to death almost as long as the perpetual motion machine.
***Now you are relying upon cliches rather than looking into the facts for yourself. Truly sad.
It’s going to take a lot more than a few tests,
***What difference would it make to you, if you require hundreds to be sold? By that time LENR is an established reality and guys like you won’t be even allowed to invest in it.
and a as yet secret catalyst and a few claims before this guy gets any serious attention except for a few dreamers, and some decades ago I was one of those dreamers as you are today.
***As Edmund Storms says, “Word Salad”. Best of luck in your Ostrich Investment Approach.
So if I were you, I would lighten up a bit and try harder to NOT take this creation
***Then you acknowledge it is real, so your entire position is invalidated.
so seriously that you isolate yourself from the critics and the questions they pose.
***Perhaps you are getting at the differnce between hypercriticism and simple criticism. For Instance, do you acknowledge that the Anomalous Heat Effect has been replicated more than 14,700 times, even before this guy Rossi came along? Hard to believe, isn’t it? And yet, it’s true, and conventional thinkers like you who have been ignorant of such facts seem to go out of their way to insult longtime freepers like me, so why is that?
You may find yourself with more egg on your face than you can wash off easily....
***My bet is that you beg off from further discussions due to your own ignorance... which suggests a certain egg on your face but no one talks about it because they forget about you.