I’m not getting drawn into this. My comment pertained to your possibly being obsessive regarding this subject. Believing in it is one thing. Attacking skeptics as you do is another. People will disagree, it’s human nature to do so. Get used to it. You just can’t control some things.
I don’t mind skepticism. What I do mind is hyperskepticism. Such as what is displayed in this thread, where they find themselves forced to defend ever-expanding conspiracy theories, and that 7 scientists can’t read multimeters and thermometers when their reputations are on the line.
LENR is the most disruptive technology in history, if it is true. To be “possibly obsessive” over such a development isn’t misguided.
I’m not getting drawn into this
***Then why did you log onto the thread, other than to spread your ‘sunshine’ and leave? Afraid of a simple question? Perhaps the most significant technical development in history, and you paint its proponent as “possibly obsessive”? What exactly do you contribute?