Kevmo:
Does this mean you’re too lazy to click through the thread to post #190?
ucansee:
Yep. Are you too lazy to just include the question so the debate can continue?
***ETFOOM. You are far more lazy than me, and besides, I DID include the question.
Kevmo: Do you expect me to speenfood you?
Ucansee: I’ve never been speenfood and I’m pretty sure I don’t want you to do it to me.
***Then do the simple clickthrough yourself. This is an amazing level of laziness that is being displayed.
Are you going to avoid these 3 questions now? I see my statement that you were avoiding some of my questions really, really dug into your craw.
***Not particularly. It just means I know bowlsheet when I see it.
You’re going through all of this over a typo?
I am trying to discuss the potentially remarkable process with you and learn about it. Which would be easier if you quit making SO MANY TYPOS (SPEENFOOD, that’s funny).
***Dude. Get a grip. Try not to be so lazy. Are you the typso police? (Yes, typso is purposefully misspelled, there’s even a ping list for typsos, not that you would be able to overcome your laziness to click through to it)
Treat the gas motor as a black box. How do you test it?
Well, first I would put it in a car and see how far I could drive it. If they wouldn’t let me take it out of the factory where they had it bolted down and where I couldn’t verify that there were no other ‘inputs’ other than the fuel they were claiming to use, I would not trust them.
***You’re avoiding the scenario I posted. They were all on the same track. Will you be avoiding this question as well?
I don’t participate in your LENR threads, but due to perusing FR via the comments tab I see them, all the time.
To say that you’re single-minded to the point of monomaniacal about this topic is not an overstatement. You’re putting Willie Green and his trains to shame, here.
Accept that some disagree or are skeptical with a little better grace, is all I’ve got to say. It’ll work out how it will, whether you’re on FR arguing with your “opposition” or not. Wanting so badly for something to be so can lead to disappointment. It’s scientific goldbuggery. Global warming is an example.