Well... if we take the Wikipedia source that claims that this discovery was first made in 1909, it's been 104 years.
Why don’t you? Do you think scientists made some error 14,700 times in a row?
If it had, don’t you think someone would have figured out ‘how’ this is working?
***Nope. This thing is very difficult, very tricky, it suffers from stigma and funding is virtually nil. Under those conditions, it takes more than 25 years to generate a breakthrough.
Not necessarily. I do question where you got the number 14,700. Although, since this has allegedly been going on since 1909, I could see it reaching that high a number.
This thing is very difficult, very tricky, it suffers from stigma and funding is virtually nil. Under those conditions, it takes more than 25 years to generate a breakthrough.
Well... that has the ring of truth.
P.S. It's almost as if the scientific community (or the powers that fund them) don't want this technology to be available.
Well... if we take the Wikipedia source that claims that this discovery was first made in 1909, it's been 104 years.