Replies

I didn’t see any endorsement of Rossi’s e-cat there. What was said is that more energy was produced than consumed by the e-cat. A high school physics teacher would question such a statement.
***Lots of things have more energy in than out. Like a gasoline motor. A high school physics teacher would know that, and would know that this isn’t the significance of what’s being claimed. The significance is that the energy density is 10,000 higher than gasoline.

But there seems to be a real lack of curiosity or questions from these seven scientists about what was hidden from them and why,
***There is tremendous curiosity. And what was hidden was the industrial secret so that it remains protected.

scientists who suffer from their own bias and prejudice as do the rest of us.
***2 of those scientists were on SKeptics Societies and were very doubtful before they began testing Rossi’s contraption. All 7 of them know how to measure Energy In and Energy Out.

Would you feel better if I waved some degrees around? Or opened my checkbook like these Swedish industrialists?
***I would ‘feel better’ if you demonstrated some simple integrity and basic scientific capability such as knowing that 7 scientists can measure Energy In and Energy Out, like a resistor.

Back to premise of the dem. With the verification of thses seven scientists are other scientists going to accept their observations without questions? Or will they pick apart the statements made and ask the same obvious quesstions?
***Time will tell. But when industrial groups start opening their checkbooks, scientists are just as human as the next guy and start taking it seriously because there’s money on the table.

Returning to the tritium notion, I have studied the P&F process and subsequenbt processes which indicate LENR. I am of a mind that something like the Casimir effect is pulling energy from the ‘zero point field’ via deutirium deposited into the crystaline matrix and then through a Casimir effect causing a tension on the crystaline metal structure, building up energy on the structure which is dumped as heat into the environment.

Just thought I would try and get the thread back onto the reason for it being posted, rather than the diversions which seem to plague this topic.

I'm dumb founded that what I clearly said could be so obviously reversed: I said the claim was that the e-cat produced more energy than it consumed but you wrote,

“Lots of things have more energy in than out.” You aren't one of those seven, are you?

But now the test has been verified! Cheap, nearly free, energy in virtually unlimited amounts is available, the holy grail has been found, the philosopher's stone, yet where are all the scientists proclaiming the world saved?

Maybe they aren't impressed with “The Verification”?? Are they waiting on peer review in Rossi’s journal?