My comment was simply about the lies we are constantly fed. Sorry if I confused or annoyed you. I guess you paid me back, because now I’m pretty annoyed at you telling me what to say.
I (and most conservatives) favor aggressively and preemptively killing foreign terrorists and those associated with them, even American citizens, and doing so with drones or F-16s or any other useful method. And yes, you are quite right about the lies that Obama and his crew are propagating -- including the lies in his announcement today of further restrictions on drone strikes.
From: Obama Administration Refuses to Label London Attack as Terrorism
In stark contrast [to the British Prime Minister's statement], the Obama Administration’s response [to the public beheading of a British soldier by two Muslims] has been to avoid calling the attack terrorism, let alone terrorism motivated by a radical Islamic ideology. Instead the Administration, via the State Department, said it stood with the U.K. in the face of “such senseless violence.”
Senseless violence? One can hardly term a targeted attack on a U.K. soldier in broad daylight — where the assailants gleefully admit the radical motivation behind their attack — “senseless violence.”
Yet, use of this terminology is nothing new for the Obama Administration. “Senseless violence” is the Administration’s catch-all phrase loyally called upon whenever motivations for a despicable act should not be ascribed, lest someone take offense.
Particularly troubling is that “senseless violence” is the same terminology the Administration used when describing the terrorist attack in Benghazi that killed the American Ambassador and three other U.S. citizens.