Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: count-your-change

I think I can believe in the possibility of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions, because on the surface it does seem possible to be able to exchange electrons at a low energy level.

However, it’s just a question of how useful this reaction is and whether it can be scaled up to industrial use.


5 posted on 05/23/2013 2:32:13 AM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jonty30
I think I can believe in the possibility of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions, because on the surface it does seem possible to be able to exchange electrons at a low energy level.

Electrons exchange all the time...

You can force a neutron into an atomic nucleus, destabilizing the nucleus. I believe this is a common method for making radioisotopes. However, this process is a net consumer of energy, not an energy source.

11 posted on 05/23/2013 3:59:31 AM PDT by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Jonty30

Quite so. And even after useful devices are introduced, it commonly takes decades after the first models of products incorporating a major new technology hit the market before the technology becomes fully practical, affordable, and economically significant.


13 posted on 05/23/2013 5:01:19 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson