Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: saganite
Residual skepticism is in order, but not adamant disbelief. Although the precise mechanism is uncertain and the details of the materials undisclosed, if, as is claimed, the inputs were properly monitored, this third party verification of a sustained, massively disproportionate output of heat in this model E-Cat is a major step forward for Rossi.
21 posted on 05/22/2013 2:52:33 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Rockingham

On May 16, Hanno Essén, a theoretical physicist and lecturer at the Swedish Royal Institute of Technology, submitted a paper to arXiv, the physics pre-print server, and claimed that he and several co-authors performed an independent test of an E-Cat device that was built by Andrea Rossi. Essén submitted a revised version of the paper on May 20.

The authors of the paper did not perform an independent test; instead, they were participants in another Rossi demonstration and performed measurements on one of Rossi’s devices in his facility.

The authors of the paper lack full knowledge of the type and preparation of the materials used in the reactor and the modulation of input power, which, according to the paper, were industrial trade secrets.

The authors didn’t perform any calorimetry and used a method to measure temperature to extrapolate output power that neither they nor anyone in the field of low-energy nuclear reaction research has ever used to analyze for heat power or energy.

http://news.newenergytimes.net/2013/05/21/rossi-manipulates-academics-to-create-illusion-of-independent-test/


22 posted on 05/22/2013 3:51:27 PM PDT by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson