what’s he right about? they’re donated books. govt spends nothing. nobody’s compelled to read it.
he’s not right about anything. first he tries to get them gone. they come back. insread of trying to gt them gone, now he wants more religious books sthere? if one book offends him, his solution is more than one book to offend him more?!?
he really isn’t offended about religious books being there, then. just one book in particular. and he doesn’t get to determine which religions should or shouldn’t be anywhere based on his own personal likes or dislikes. let him open up a hotel and decide what all donated religious books, if any, he wants in his hotel rooms.
Oh I’m not saying he’s prick, but when using logic failed, he went to the well and did what he thought he had to do: Show the hypocrisy of the situation. Do I want 50 stupid books of myths clogging up my hotel room? Of course not.
But if a government hotel at a national park “endorses” one religion and shuts out others, that’ll lose in court every time.
It’s like when creationists try to push their nonsense in public schools. Fine, “now teach all 4000 creation myths and give “equal time.” Those who push the christian myth never seem to like that idea and have a difficult time explaining why.
I meant “Im not saying he’s NOT a prick.’