And, Tokyo Rove supported him. Q. E. D.
Agree with you on fact that there were some "spit-at-home" conservatives, as you described them.
But any honest "spit-at-home" person who responded to a pollster would tell him that he (she) wasn't likely to vote. The pollster, who was dealing only with likely voters, would not have included that response as a Romney vote in computing his bottom line data. Yet although these voters were excluded from the pollster's results, Romney still held the small polling leads I mentioned in just about all the swing states, which somehow "disappeared" when the purported results were announced. This was unlike any other recent presidential election.
The most likely and logical single explanation for that discrepancy in Obama's favor between the purported election results and the late pre-election polls would be fraud and cheating on the part of the 'rats. "Spit-at-home" voters would not count in either the purported post-election results or the pre-election polling, so they can't be an explanation for the discrepancies to which I'm referring.
Obama was off his game too ~ he lost 4 million votes he’d had in 2008!
Voter fraud must be a priority for the GOP or should I say “conservatives” since the GOP has no gonads.