Yes, I've pointed out on other threads the statistical impossibility of Romney being "shut out" completely in any sizable election precinct, even in predominantly black neighborhoods. Same thing happened in Cleveland precincts. Notice that the shenanigans were deliberately targeted to swing states where the 'Rats thought they could very will lose if they didn't cheat on the vote tallies.
Didn't know about the problems suffered by True the Vote, but they might explain why neither the defrauded Romney campaign nor any Republican organization I know of has yet to complain publicly about the fraud and cheating that occurred on behalf of the 'rats.
The "stealing" of the presidential election was likely accomplished not only by the "traditional" low-tech schemes - e.g., same voter votes multiple times in different locations (aided and abetted by prolonged polling hours due to "early voting" and by "Motor Voter" or same-day registration) or votes both as absentee and in-person, others vote for deceased or moved-out or handicapped people, ineligible voters cast ballots - but also by high-tech hacking into vulnerable electronic voting equipment such as optical scanners and touch screen systems. It was targeted to Democrat dominated cities and counties in the swing states.
BTW, the discrepancies in Obama's favor between the purported vote totals state-by-state and the polling forecasts are much more likely to be caused by this fraud and cheating than by errors in polling technique. In other words, the best pollster in the world can't account for fraud and cheating in his projected results.
The “stealing of the election” was accomplished by traitors within the Republican establishment who diverted conservative efforts.
This effort is exemplified by Romney himself, refusing to meet with Sarah Palin. He wanted to keep her and the Tea Party as far from this election as possible.
THAT is why we lost.
Not to forget the SEIU and the voting machines.
Exactly what you and I have been saying all along.
Seems like we were NOT being “paranoid” after all.
Example, if you have 1000 people and 10 are gay, the other 990 are not gay. Yet if the not gays answer normally ~ at 9% ~ they'll account for 90 responses. If the gays answer abnormally, that is all the time, the 10 gays will account for 10 responses.
Simple math. Let's add in unionized school teachers. Then, the abortion industry. You probably have a good 30% of the total responses accounted for by 3 small far leftwing or very special interest groups.
I don't think you can trust Romney's polls ~ the gays liked him eh!
Thanks justiceseeker93.
Thank you for all your insights, dear justiceseeker93!